next-gen-iphone-may-be-baptized-in-liquidmetal V Town of Pleasant Val. , 2 NY3d 617, 626; Town of Orangetown v Magee, next-gen-iphone-may-be-baptized-in-liquidmetal 88 NY2d 41, 49). Examining the claim for a violation of substantive due process next-gen-iphone-may-be-baptized-in-liquidmetal the court addressed the application of 42 USC 1983 in the context of land use disputes:. ; see Zuckerman v City of New next-gen-iphone-may-be-baptized-in-liquidmetal York, 49 NY2d 557, 562).
The Court then reviewed the basic criteria in determining next-gen-iphone-may-be-baptized-in-liquidmetal whether to grant summary judgment stating:. v Jennifer Realty next-gen-iphone-may-be-baptized-in-liquidmetal Co. , 5 NY3d 582, 591; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, next-gen-iphone-may-be-baptized-in-liquidmetal 87-88). v State next-gen-iphone-may-be-baptized-in-liquidmetal Street Bank and Trust Co.